讲座人:Jesse Owen Hearns-Branaman,博士(英国利兹大学),助理教授,泰国国立发展管理学院
语言:全英文,不设翻译。
时间:2016年1月28日(周四),下午2-5点
地点:华体会娱乐场 广播电视研究中心会议室(39号楼302室)
注意:由于场地空间有限,请有意参加者发送邮件至:jideqiang@cuc.edu.cn,提前预定位置。邮件请命名为:讲座报名-姓名-单位信息。
讲座人简介:
Jesse Owen Hearns-Branaman是泰国国立发展管理学院语言与传播研究院助理教授。他在英国诺丁汉大学获得国际传播研究硕士学位,在利兹大学传播研究所获得博士学位。目前,他已经出版了两本英文专著,分别是2014年的《新闻的政治经济学在中国:制造共识》(Lexington出版社)和2016年的《新闻与真实的哲学:超越客观性和平衡》(Routledge出版社)。他的研究领域是新闻的政治经济学和社会学,特别关注美国、英国、泰国和中国。他曾经在利兹大学、谢菲尔德大学、利兹贝克特大学、诺丁汉大学(宁波)和浙江万里学院等学校任职。
主题简介:
全球的新闻理念更多地倒向一种理想主义的、西方中心的、自由资本主义模式,尤其是在比较或者评价其他国家媒介制度的时候。在21世纪,由于越来越多的批评指向自由资本主义媒介制度的缺陷以及对于另类媒介制度的诉求,这一“冷战”思维的二元对立框架正在逐渐失去解释力。我将尝试着从以下四个媒介研究的角度参与上述学术批评,分别是:媒介所有权,媒介的议程设置功能,信息的来源和有关客观性的新闻话语。这一尝试基于我近来所做的有关中国和美国新闻业的政治经济与社会学研究。我希望通过这些研究和反思,考察美国新媒介研究如何从中国的新媒介研究中获得启发,比如对这些概念的超越:所有权、议程设置、信源和客观性。
Guest lecture: What American journalism studies can learn from China?
Jesse Owen Hearns-Branaman
PhD & Assistant Professor, National Institute of Development Administration
Host: The National Centre for Radio and Television Studies, Communication University of China (CUC)
Time: 2-5pm, January 28, 2016
Venue: Room 302, Building 39, CUC
Attention! Due to the limited space, please reserve your seat by sending an email with your personal information (title and affiliation, etc.) to jideqiang@cuc.edu.cn no later than January 26. Thanks!
Biography of the speaker
Jesse Owen Hearns-Branaman is Assistant Professor at the Graduate School of Language and Communications, National Institute of Development Administration, Thailand. He holds a PhD from University of Leeds’ Institute of Communication Studies and an MA in International Communication Studies from the University of Nottingham. He is the author of Journalism and the Philosophy of Truth: Beyond Objectivity and Balance (Routledge, 2016) and The Political Economy of News in China: Manufacturing Harmony (Lexington, 2014), and has also published in Journalism, Journalism Studies, and The International Journal of Baudrillard Studies. He researches the political economy and sociology of journalism, emphasizing the US, UK, Thailand, and China. He has also taught at the University of Leeds, University of Sheffield, Leeds Beckett University, University of Nottingham Ningbo, Zhejiang Wanli University, and Zhejiang University Ningbo Institute of Technology.
Abstract: What American journalism studies can learn from China?
The search for universal journalistic norms has, more often than not, turned to an idealized Western Liberal-Capitalist model, which it then used as the yardstick to judge other media systems around the world. This Cold War-style binary is becoming increasingly irrelevant in the 21st Century due do both sustained academic critiques of Liberal-Capitalist media systems and the development of viable alternative media systems. This paper will attempt to contribute to the above critiques, focusing on four areas of media studies; ownership of media, media’s agenda setting function, sourcing of information, and journalistic discourse on objectivity. It will draw on recent political-economic and sociological research on Chinese and American journalism in order to see what American news media studies can learn from Chinese news media studies in regards to the above concepts of ownership, agenda setting, sourcing, and objectivity.